FedOpsFedOps
Description
**Three (3) additional documents: cutsheet, furniture plan and sign type were added 11 May 2026. Combined Synopsis/Solicitation OBL-WN/SCARS 4th Floor Furniture Solicitation Number: FA8601-26-Q-0016 Notice Type: Combined Synopsis/Solicitation (RFQ) Issuing Office: AFLCMC/PZIBA Posted Date: May 8, 2026 Response Date: June 8, 2026, 11:00 AM EST Set-Aside: Unrestricted (Full and Open Competition) Classification Code (PSC): 7110 — Office Furniture NAICS Code: 337214 — Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing Small Business Size Standard: 1,100 employees Description This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial products prepared in accordance with Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul (RFO) Part 12. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; offers are being requested and a separate written solicitation will not be issued. This solicitation incorporates provisions and clauses in effect through the RFO (effective April 17, 2026) and the Revolutionary Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (RDFARS) as of the date of issuance. The Department of the Air Force intends to award a firm-fixed-price contract for the OBL-WN/SCARS 4th Floor Furniture in accordance with the attached Statement of Work (SOW), on a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) basis. The Schedule of Supplies, place of performance, delivery information, and the full list of applicable provisions and clauses are set forth in the attached SF 1449 and solicitation. Award is subject to the availability of funds. Basis for Award Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal: Conforms to this combined synopsis/solicitation; Receives an “Acceptable” rating on Technical Capability; and Contains the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP), determined fair, reasonable, and not unbalanced. Technical Capability. Single pass/fail factor. To be rated Acceptable, the proposal must demonstrate that the offered item meets or exceeds every requirement of the SOW. Each proposal shall: Identify the proposed manufacturer, make, and model; Provide manufacturer technical data, datasheets, or specification sheets verifying compliance with each SOW characteristic (including but not limited to: Systems Furniture, Casegoods, Seating, Tables, Signage, and any other parameter specified); and Identify any deviations or exceptions to the SOW. A proposal will be rated Unacceptable if it fails to demonstrate compliance with any SOW requirement, takes material exception, or lacks sufficient technical detail to permit evaluation. Restating a requirement without supporting data is insufficient. Past Performance and Responsibility. Prior to award, the Contracting Officer will perform a responsibility determination under RFO Part 9, including review of the offeror's record in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS). Adverse findings may render an offeror nonresponsible. The Governm…
Classification
Place of Performance
Contracting Office
Contacts