F10295 Console Furnitureview on SAM.gov

NOTE: 05c- F10295 Console Furniture Plan DWG.dwg (SAM.gov does not accept this type of document)-Interested parties reach out to Brian Algeo ( brian.algeo.1@us.af.mil ) for a copy by email. Combined Synopsis/Solicitation Notice Type: Combined Synopsis/Solicitation (RFQ) Issuing Office: AFLCMC/PZIBA, Base Support Contracting, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH Posted Date: August 24, 2026 Response Date: September 10, 2026, 11:00 AM EST Set-Aside: Unrestricted (Full and Open Competition) Classification Code (PSC): 7110 — Office Furniture NAICS Code: 337214 — Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing Small Business Size Standard: 1,100 employees Description This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial products prepared in accordance with the Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul (RFO) Part 12. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; offers are being requested, and a separate written solicitation will not be issued. This solicitation incorporates provisions and clauses in effect through the RFO (effective April 17, 2026) and the Revolutionary Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (RDFARS) as of the date of issuance. The Department of the Air Force intends to award a firm-fixed-price contract for F10295 Console Furniture, Project 2026SH080 in accordance with the attached Statement of Work (SOW), on a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) basis. The Schedule of Supplies, place of performance, delivery information, and the full list of applicable provisions and clauses are set forth in the attached solicitation documents. Award is subject to the availability of funds. Basis for Award Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal: Conforms to this combined synopsis/solicitation; Receives an “Acceptable” rating on Technical Capability; and Contains the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP), determined to be fair, reasonable, and not unbalanced. Technical Capability. This is a single pass/fail factor. To be rated Acceptable, the proposal must demonstrate that the offered items meet or exceed every requirement of the SOW. Each proposal shall: Identify the proposed manufacturer(s), make(s), and model(s); Provide manufacturer technical data, datasheets, or specification sheets verifying compliance with each SOW characteristic; and Identify any deviations or exceptions to the SOW. A proposal will be rated Unacceptable if it fails to demonstrate compliance with any SOW requirement, takes a material exception, or lacks sufficient technical detail to permit evaluation. Restating a requirement without supporting data is insufficient. Past Performance and Responsibility. Prior to award, the Contracting Officer may perform a responsibility determination under RFO Part 9, including a review of the offeror's record in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS). Adverse findings may render an offeror non-responsible. The Government reserves …