Design and Build Covered Parking Structure for Fighter Aircraftview on SAM.gov

AMENDMENT 0001 The purpose of this amendment is as follows: Answer the following requests for information (RFI) regarding incumbent requirement and past performance evaluation criteria: QUESTION: The solicitation requires offerors to provide 2-4 similar projects in scope and magnitude completed by the offeror's firm over the past three years. Please confirm whether offerors may submit relevant project experience and past performance from proposed key subcontractors, specialty subcontractors, design partners, specialty manufacturers, or teaming partners that will perform a significant role in contract performance. If allowable, please clarify whether subcontractor/team member experience may satisfy the past performance requirement or only supplement the prime contractor's experience, and whether the submitted firm must perform a minimum percentage or primary portion of the related work. Reason for Inquiry: This clarification will assist offerors in preparing compliant past performance submissions and selection of my Design/Build team. GOVERNMENT ANSWER : Past performance regarding predecessor companies of the offeror and/or subcontractors, key personnel, and subcontractors who will perform a significant role in contract performance will satisfy past performance requirements. Past performance evaluation criteria within the solicitation has been updated accordingly. Prime contractor performance is subject to limitations within RFO Clause 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting (Deviation 2026-O0038) found within the model contract. QUESTION : We would like to know if this is a brand-new contract OR if there is (was) an incumbent performing these services. If not brand new, could you please provide the current / previous contract number? GOVERNMENT ANSWER: This is a brand New Requirement; no previous contract information is available. Update Solicitation – evaluation criteria as follows: Past Performance : The Government may utilize any references provided by the Contractor, along with information available from past contracts/orders with the Dept of War and any information found using sources such as Federal Government sources (i.e. sam.gov), SPRS or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) to determine if the Contractor has acceptable or neutral Past Performance. Past performance regarding predecessor companies of the offeror and/or subcontractors, key personnel, and subcontractors who will perform a significant role in contract performance will satisfy past performance requirements. Past Performance will be evaluated using the following rating system Acceptable: The contractor shows a demonstrated ability to meet contract requirements in prior or current contracts, including quality of work, timeliness, cost control, business relations, and adherence to contract terms. Neutral: Offeror does not have a past performance record. Unacceptable: The contractor has a documented history of failing to meet contract requirements, incl…